Barber et al., (2000) Alliance predicts patient’ outcome beyond in-treatment change in symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psycholgoy, 68,1027-1032.
This
article evaluated whether the strength of the therapeutic alliance was
predictive (“causally related”) of outcome independent of improvements in
depression (BDI) from the beginning of therapy until the alliance was measured.
88
clients in separate clinical trials for treatment (supportive/expressive
dynamic therapy) of either (a) chronic depression, (b) generalized anxiety
disorder, or (c) either avoidant or obsessive compulsive personality disorder
answered the BDI at each individual session and completed a measure of the
strength of alliance (the CALPAS) at weeks 2, 5, and 10 of therapy.
Important
adjusted scores used in the analyses were the SUBSEQUENT CHANGE SCORE, which
was a residualized termination BDI score adjusted for the BDI score in
which alliance was assessed; and the PRIOR CHANGE SCORE, which was the
residualized session BDI score adjusted for the intake BDI score.
Mean
BDIs improved over sessions: Intake=20.4, week 2=16.0,
Week
5=14.3, week 10=12.5, month 4=10.8, and termination=9.3.
CALPAS
predicted residualized SUBSEQUENT CHANGE in depression at 4 mo. and at
termination, after partialing out PRIOR CHANGE in depression. Correlation
ranging from r = .21 to r = .33, all sig.
PRIOR
CHANGE predicted CALPAS scores at sessions 5 and 10, but not session 2,
probably because there was insufficient improvement in depression by
Session 2 to affect ratings of the
strength of the alliance.