Computing RMSPE's for individual chance nodes in the influence diagram allows prediction skill on particular nodes to be assessed and gives the RMSPE interpretable units. When the sample contains unknown errors however, the RMSPE should not be viewed as the ultimate criterion for model selection. Rather, it should be examined in light of known weaknesses in the sample. An example of such an assessment follows.
Separate RMSPE values were computed for herbivore counts and detection fraction predictions over the observation times. For cH = .5, these calculations yielded 3757.5, and .727 for Bt and Dt, respectively. For cH = 0., these values are 3716.9, and .720. Figure 4 gives the predicted and observed values on these two variables as a function of time for cH = .5 and cH = 0. The two sets of predictions are indistinguishable.
***** [Figure 4 about here] *****