| Date: | Wed May 12 7:34:10 1999 |
| From: | sniderja@email.uc.edu |
| Subject: | small rod tapers |
Below is the taper (action length 5' 2") some of you requested for the Orvis 6' 6wt one piece. 1 0.086 5 0.103 10 0.122 15 0.132 20 0.144 25 0.159 30 0.171 35 0.184 40 0.198 45 0.209 50 0.225 55 0.239 60 0.257 62 0.275 The stress curve for this rod appears very similar to the one for Tom Smithwick's 5' 6" 5 wt., and the latter is one sweet casting rod. Indeed, the main difference between the 6' Orvis and the 5' 6" Smithwick seems to be from the 50" station on down. Tom's rod is heavier in the butt section than the Orvis, and you can feel the Orvis all the way to the butt (although it is in no way a "wimp" of a rod). I have cast the 6' 6 wt and very much like the feel of it. I am building one at the moment, in a nodeless format, so don't know how much that will change the feel of the rod. I have also thought about building the Smithwick model using the Orvis measurements in the butt section. Another short rod for those of you so interested is a 5' 3/4wt. I have built two of these for a couple of Montana ranchers/fly fishers (as gifts) who seem to think that the rod is "the berries." This rod throws an extremely tight looped line, and casts very nicely out to 35-40 feet. I was building an A. J. Thramer taper for a 4'4" 4 wt rod (of which I have built three and like the taper very much) and at the last moment (in a fit of emotional frenzy) decided to experiment and extend the rod to 5'. I am sure you modelers and engineer types will cringe at this type of experimentation (done with absolutely no forethought) and likely will feel that the taper reflects such. However, several folks cast the rod at a recent local fly fishing show and seemed to like the taper. Indeed, I had another request for this rod over the weekend. 1 0.071 5 0.074 10 0.089 15 0.102 20 0.118 25 0.136 30 0.151 35 0.163 40 0.179 45 0.196 50 0.220 55 0.220 60 0.220 Jerry Snider
######