next up previous contents
Next: The general case Up: An introduction to calculus Previous: Squaring functions

Cubing functions

The analysis here is entirely parallel to the analysis for squaring functions. When f(x) = kx3 the graph appears to be an upward curving arc. Again it makes no sense to ask about slope directly. As before, we look at chords first. Pick a point on the graph of y = f(x), call it (a, ka3) and another different point, (a+h, k(a+h)3) also on the graph.























The chord joining these points has slope

\begin{displaymath}
\begin{array}
{rcl}
{\displaystyle\frac{k(a+h)^3 - ka^3}{a+h...
 ...)a + a^2)}{a+h-h}}\\ & = &
k((a+h)^2 + (a+h)a + a^2)\end{array}\end{displaymath}

As h approaches , the slopes of the chords approach 3ka2 and it is reasonable to define the slope of the graph to be 3ka2 at the point (a, ka3).

For example, the line y = ka3 + 3ka2(x-a) touches the graph of y = f(x) only at (a,ka2) but does not cross it:

\begin{displaymath}
kx^3 - (ka^3 + 3ka^2(x-a)) = k(x^3 - a^3 - 3a^2(x-a)) = k(x-a)^2(x+2a) \geq 0\end{displaymath}

since $x\geq 0$.























The area problem is solved in the same fashion as with the squaring functions. Again pick a positive number a and divide the segment on the horizontal axis from (0,0) to (a,0) into N subintervals of equal width. The endpoints of these subintervals first coordinates $0, a/N, 2a/N, \dots, (N-1)a/N$, and each subinterval has width a/N. It is clear from the diagram below that the area between our segment of the horizontal axis and the graph of y = f(x) is less than or equal to the sum of the areas of the circumscribed rectangles, which is given by

\begin{displaymath}
\begin{array}
{rcl}
U_N
& := &
(a/N)k(a/N)^3 + (a/N)k(2a/N)^...
 ...\\ & = &
k(a^3/N^3)(1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + \cdots + N^3),\end{array}\end{displaymath}

and the area is larger than or equal to the sum of the areas of the inscribed rectangles:

\begin{displaymath}
\begin{array}
{rcl}
L_N
& := &
(a/N)k(0a/N)^3 + (a/N)k(a/N)^...
 ...(a^3/N^3)(0^3 + 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + \cdots + (N-1)^3).\end{array}\end{displaymath}























In other words,

\begin{displaymath}
L_N \leq \;{\rm Area}\;\leq U_N.\end{displaymath}

Now we can apply our observation about differences of powers of consecutive integers:

\begin{displaymath}
\begin{array}
{rcl}
L_N 
& = &
k(a^3/N^3)(0^3 + 1^3 + +2^3 +...
 ...{4}\right)}\\ & = &
k(a^4/N^4)(N^4/3)\\ & = &
ka^4/4\end{array}\end{displaymath}

and

\begin{displaymath}
\begin{array}
{rcl}
U_N 
& = &
k(a^4/N^4)(1^3 + +2^3 + 3^3 +...
 ...4}\right)}\\ & = &
k(a^4/N^4)(N^4/4)\\ & = &
ka^4/4.\end{array}\end{displaymath}

In other words,

\begin{displaymath}
L_N \leq ka^4/4 \leq U_N\end{displaymath}

Therefore

\begin{displaymath}
\vert{\rm Area} - ka^4/4\vert \leq U_N - L_N \leq k(a^4/N^4)N^3 = ka^4/N\end{displaymath}








Therefore, the difference between the area and ka4/4 is smaller than any positive number, meaning ${\rm Area} = ka^4/4$.


next up previous contents
Next: The general case Up: An introduction to calculus Previous: Squaring functions
David G Radcliffe
8/18/1998