Next: Another application of the
Up: More on composite functions
Previous: Continuity composite functions
Recall the definition of differentiable.
is
differentiable at
means that the limit as h approaches of

exists. We denote this limit by g'(b). Suppose that g is differentiable
at b. Let us define a function DQ by the rule

From the definitions of continuous and of differentiable, DQ is continous at
h = 0. Let
be given by f(x) = x-b. This
function is continuous, its range is the domain of DQ, and
. Therefore

Since for
we have
and

we have shown that

In fact, we can do much better. If
, c(a) = 0 and c is
continuous at a, then

This is what we need to prove the chain rule. Suppose that f is
differentiable at a and g is differentiable at f(a). Put c(h) =
f(a+h)-f(a). Since f is differentiable at a we know that f is continuous
at a, so c is continuous at h = 0. (What is the domain of c?) Observe
that if b = f(a)

since neither side is defined for h = 0 and for
if f(a+h) - f(a) =
0 we have

while if
then

Therefore

We can also make the reverse argument. Suppose that

Then

Again, more generally, if
and g is
differentiable at f(a) then

Next: Another application of the
Up: More on composite functions
Previous: Continuity composite functions
David G Radcliffe
8/18/1998