Next: More on rates of
Up: Some extensions of our
Previous: Some extensions of our
What about functions like
,
or
, f(x) =
x5/3? Here we have to be a lot cleverer with our algebra, but remarkably,
the results are identical to the case of integer powers, with the exception of
the slope at (0,0) in some cases. The reason things work out is the
following clever observation. Suppose that p is a positive integer and x
and y are non-negative numbers. Then
x - y = (x1/p)p - (y1/p)p
so (x-y) is a difference of
powers of the
roots of
x and y. So, for example, if
then (remembering
and
)

so if a > 0 then it appears that as h approaches the slopes of chords
approach

which fits the pattern of f(x) = xp giving f'(a) = pxp-1 which we
observed for p an integer.
If a = 0 then

The result of letting h approach is to get numbers which are larger
than any fixed real number, and our method fails. We shall see later that
there is still a line deserving of the name tangent line, but it is vertical
and has no slope.
Here is the same idea applied to
,
. This
time we will get a difference of cubes! For the moment, let x= a+h so things
don't get even messier than they will be.
![\begin{displaymath}
\begin{array}
{rcl}
{\displaystyle \frac{f(x) - f(a)}{x-a} }...
...]{x})^2 + \sqrt[3]{x}\sqrt[3]{a} + (\sqrt[3]{a})^2}}\end{array}\end{displaymath}](img80.gif)
As h approaches we see that x approaches a and, so the slopes of the
chords appear to approach
![\begin{displaymath}
\frac{1}{3(\sqrt[3]{a})^2} = (1/3)a^{-2/3} = (1/3)a^{(1/3)-1}\end{displaymath}](img81.gif)
(provided
). If a = 0, the analysis fails (for even more
complicated reasons then with square root), but otherwise we see the same
pattern as before: to compute f', reduce the exponent by 1 and multiply by
the old exponent. In fact, this holds for any positive root at all: if
f(x) = x1/p and
then f'(a) = (1/p)a(1/p)-1.
Next: More on rates of
Up: Some extensions of our
Previous: Some extensions of our
David G Radcliffe
8/18/1998