Next: Some extensions of our
Up: Calculus Lecture Notes
Previous: The fundamental theorem of
In an earlier homework assignment we saw that it will be possible to compute
the rate of change of the exponential function,
,
, at any
value a if we could compute the rate of change at a=0, and that the rate of
change at appears to be 1. We will demonstrate by analytical means later
that this correct, and that, remarkably, the rate of change of the exponential
function at a is
!
This is an extremely important observation for the following reason. There are
many physical systems which satisfy the following law: The rate of change of
the system is proportional to the current state of the system. Some examples
are:
- The rate at which bacteria grow is proportional to the number of bacteria
present;
- The rate at which a radioactive substance decays is proportional to the
amount of the substance present;
- The rate at which the temperature difference between an object and it's
surrounding changes is proportional to the temperature difference.
In mathematical language, if we take the proportionality constants to be 1,
and denote the state of the system at time x to be S(x), we want
S'(x) = S(x), that is we want a function whose rate of change at x is the
value of the function at x. In other words, we want the exponential
function.
Two more important functions to study in this regard are
and
. We
shall demonstrate below that their rates of change can be computed from the
rate of change of
at x=0 by using trigonometric identities, just as
the rate of change of
could be computed from its rate of change at
and an identity for exponents.
First, to get an idea of what is happening, consider the plot of the difference
quotient for
at x=0 as a function of h:

It would appear that the rate of change of
is 1 at x=0.
Now consider the plot of

for h=0.01 as we vary a from
to
.
Sure looks like the graph of
on the same interval. Let's try to
see why:

In this last expression, the first term should approach
while the second term should approach
as h
approaches , confirming what we saw in the graph. Indeed, by analytical
methods we will be able to confirm what we see here, that the rate of change of
at x=a is
.
The function
is handled in the same way. Here is a plot of the
difference quotient for cosine, with h=0.01, for values from
to
. Observe that the graph looks like that of
over the same
range.
Here the algebra to support this observation. It is nearly identical to that
for
. Can you explain why?

This time the first term approaches
while the second term approaches
, confirming what we saw in the graph.
Next: Some extensions of our
Up: Calculus Lecture Notes
Previous: The fundamental theorem of
David G Radcliffe
8/18/1998